In this Unbroken review, I’ll tell you why this is a torturous movie that may leave you broken.
There are various predispositions and expectations one has when they enter a movie. Have you seen lots of previews? Do you adore or respect one or many of the actors? Do know what the movie is about before walking in the theater? These pre-sentiments can have a vital impact on what you will think of the final result.
In the case of Unbroken, I knew practically nothing about the film prior to entering the theater. I only had vague notions that this was a movie made by Angelina Jolie about (I thought) some sort of great American hero who triumphs against all odds (see trailer below).
***The FOLLOWING MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IT***
Then, the movie begins and, for a brief time, my preconceived notions are confirmed. In the main character, Louis “Louie” Zamperini, we discover a rambunctious young boy, an Italian immigrant in America, who is always up to no good and feels that he is unworthy of being great. His older brother intervenes, however, and teaches Louie that he is special and can do great things. With his older brother’s help and inspiration, Louie builds his character and his physique to become an aspiring Olympic track star; he is chosen to represent America in the Olympics in Germany in 1936, where he will earn a 3rd place metal, and in Japan in 1940.
Then life and war intervene to derail Louie’s life path and, in my opinion, the movie. He enlists in the military and is commissioned as a bombardier in the Pacific Islands during World War II. Great, I thought, I am usually intrigued by movies about World War II with their stories of battles, heroism, and redemption.
Except, there were very few war battles, not enough heroism, and precious little redemption.
After the buildup in the beginning where we see Louie’s ascent (about 15 minutes of the almost 2 1/2 hour movie), here is what happens: Plane battle in the sky with the Japanese where some die but Louie survives; sent on a rescue mission where plane crashes in the ocean; many people die and Louie survives with 2 others; two of the three, one being Louie of course, survive on a life-boat for nearly 2 months, overcoming all sorts of lost-at-sea deathtraps (this seems to take up at least 45 minutes of the movie…I started looking at my watch at this point–never a good sign); then, they are picked up by Japanese military men, spend time in a captive hole, and are tortured for information. Finally, Louis is transferred to a military prison where he is tortured for the rest of the movie.
And that’s it.
As I watched, the word sadist came to mind. This movie seemed to made for people who like to watch 2 hours of pure, human torture.
The movie is marketed as a “triumph of the human spirit” kind of story. In spite of all this torture, Louie survives and remains Unbroken. I didn’t leave the movie feeling that way at all. The main thing Louie did was not die.
In fact, there was a moment in the movie that I thought was going to be a turning point, a glimpse of redemptive heroism, but was not. The American POWs, one of whom was a translator and could understand the Japanese officers’ conversations, overheard that if the Americans won the war, the Japanese officers had been instructed to kill all of the American prisoners. I thought this may be a redemptive moment, one in which the Americans realize that they must revolt or die trying. But did it happen? No. As all realized the war had come to an end, with America the victors, the Japanese officers ordered all American POWs into the water and most, seemingly, thought that they would be shot. What did they do? Nothing. Nothing at all. No heroism, no revolt. Nada. They simply did not die because the Japanese officers decided not to shoot them as an American plane flys overhead.
There is an element of heroism in not dying. But the title of this movie-Unbroken, is certainly misleading. Louie and his cohorts are completely broken. We see that in the “account” of Louie after the war as he suffers from PTSD and alcoholism.
Many years after the war, Louie’s life does take a drastic turn for the better which you can read about on WikiPedia here.
But the movie does not comprise any of Louie’s post-war life.
The movie, Unbroken, is simply 2 hours of human torture that may leave you feeling, well, somewhat Broken.
Unbroken: Reviews from Around the Web
It’s only fair that I leave you with some other reviews from around the web of Unbroken. I realize that my perspective, though always the most insightful, is not the only one 🙂
‘Unbroken’ review: Angelina Jolie tortures her audience with scene after bloody scene: The title says it all in this review of Unbroken from The Oregonian.
‘Unbroken’ Reviews: Angelina Jolie’s Star Jack O’Connell Gets More Critical Praise Than She Does: This review praises the lead, Jack O’Connell. I would agree that the acting in the movie deserves more praise than the movie.
“Unbroken” review: Angelina Jolie’s uneven second effort: Mike Lasalle of SFGate says: “One of these days, Angelina Jolie might very well direct a great movie. She has a rare talent and intense concerns and interests. But first she is going to have to suppress some self-defeating impulses that have now twice taken potentially effective films and rendered them ridiculous” and he also questions whether director Angelina Jolie may have some sort of sadomasochistic obsession.
Unbroken: The Official Trailer
Here is the official trailer of Unbroken, which I feel misleads the audience into believing that they will get a story of heroism and redemption rather than 2 hours of torture.
Get your copy of his latest book entitled Obvious Conclusions, stories of a Midwestern emigrant influenced and corrupted by many years living in San Francisco and abroad. It just received its first outstanding review "...reminiscent of David Sedaris or Augusten Burroughs" on Amazon UK.
Latest posts by Richard Cummings (see all)
- The Google Pixel Fold: Why It’s the Star of Google I/O 2023 - May 9, 2023
- Book Review:Malibu Rising by Taylor Jenkins Reid - March 6, 2022
- Beautiful World, Where Are You: A Book Review by Richard Cummings - February 18, 2022
Your review of the movie is on-point for the most part, but you are judging Zamperini based off a movie?
Zamperini did so much more than what was shown in the film. They left out other key moments in his life where, sure it wasn’t as torturous as a POW camp, but still character-testing nonetheless. He had opportunities to make the coward, easy-way-out choices but he didn’t. He faced adversity, and even his own demons.
Criticizing a movie is one thing. Judging someone based off a fictional or a several key fact removed tale really doesn’t do the person justice.
Henry, couldn’t agree more.
I only judged the movie on its own…I heard from so many people about how great the book “Unbroken” was but, apparently, the movie only covered the “torturous” aspects and left out all of the redemptive moments that happened after.
I simply felt misled. The trailer for the movie indicates some sort of redemption which we never get to see.
Cheers and thx for the comment!
I wasn’t crazy about the movie either, but I find your assertion that a bunch of POW’s who’ve been starved almost to death in a forced labor camp with no weapons standing knee deep in water are somehow supposed to overpower the fully rested and armed guards around them even more annoying than the move was.